Secure Score & Compliance Baselines
9 checks · 2 sub-categories
A list of settings is not an audit. Every finding we raise is scored for real-world risk, tied to its effect on your Microsoft Secure Score, and mapped to the recognised baselines your insurer, your board or your accreditor will ask about — so the report doubles as evidence, not just a to-do list.
Scoring and prioritisation
Current Microsoft Secure Score and trend
Your score, the comparison against similar-sized organisations, and which recommendations actually move it.
Risk-prioritised findings
Each finding is rated on likelihood and impact for a business your size — not Microsoft's generic points value.
Effort and licence cost per remediation
So you can start with the fixes that are free and take ten minutes.
Framework mapping
ACSC Essential Eight
Findings mapped to the applicable Essential Eight mitigation strategies and the maturity level your current configuration supports.
- Essential Eight
CIS Microsoft 365 Foundations Benchmark
Control-by-control mapping against the CIS benchmark used by security-focused providers worldwide.
- CIS Microsoft 365 Benchmark
CISA SCuBA and EIDSCA baselines
The US government cloud baselines and Entra ID Security Config Analyzer test families, both of which cover controls CIS does not.
Privacy Act and the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme
Where your configuration affects your ability to detect, assess and report an eligible data breach within the required timeframe.
- Privacy Act 1988
- NDB scheme
Cyber insurance questionnaire alignment
Documented answers to the control questions insurers ask at renewal, so you're not attesting to something you can't evidence.
NIST CSF 2.0 function mapping
For businesses reporting to a parent company or enterprise customer that works in NIST terms.
Want to know where you actually stand?
Every one of these checks is run as part of a single point-in-time audit, delivered as a plain-English, risk-prioritised report.